Recently, 83 public health experts jointly wrote to the European Commission, expressing their deep concern about the EU’s increasing e-cigarette tax burden. The letter emphasizes that excessive e-cigarette taxation may run counter to EU public health policy and even lead to a regression in health policy. The letter has sparked widespread discussion, particularly within the e-cigarette industry and public health. As the European Commission prepares to review and adjust its existing e-cigarette tax policy, these experts’ voices have undoubtedly caught the attention of policymakers.

In the letter, the experts point out that e-cigarettes, as a relatively new public health tool, can effectively help smokers reduce their dependence on traditional tobacco products. Research shows that e-cigarette use can significantly reduce health risks for smokers, especially among long-term smokers. However, as more and more EU member states increase e-cigarette tax burdens, some experts believe that such policies may cause smokers to abandon e-cigarettes and switch to traditional cigarettes, which could be counterproductive and undermine long-term improvements in public health.

A key point raised by public health experts is that excessive e-cigarette taxation may be suppressing its role as a smoking alternative. Many people have successfully quit smoking through e-cigarettes. Especially now that the harmful effects of smoking are widely recognized, e-cigarettes, as an alternative, play an even more crucial role in global public health policy. E-cigarettes offer smokers a less harmful alternative and are an effective way to reduce smoking rates and improve public health.

However, e-cigarette taxation, particularly in the EU, is becoming a significant barrier to the widespread adoption of this alternative. Current policies have led to rising e-cigarette prices, with some countries even taxing e-cigarettes at the same rate as traditional cigarettes. This measure could put low-income groups out of reach and prevent them from enjoying the health benefits of e-cigarettes.

The emergence of the VEEHOO e-cigarette brand responds to this market demand. As a brand focused on consumer health, VEEHOO adheres to high standards in product design, striving to provide a safer and healthier alternative. VEEHOO’s innovative technology and advanced e-liquid formulas meet the needs of smokers while effectively reducing the harms of smoking. Furthermore, VEEHOO e-cigarettes are relatively affordable, making them affordable for the general public and providing more options for smokers seeking to quit.

From a public health perspective, VEEHOO’s success lies not only in its product popularity but also in its contribution to the global strategy to reduce cigarette consumption. The VEEHOO brand is undoubtedly a leading example in the e-cigarette industry, not only focusing on product quality and safety but also actively educating consumers about the health benefits of e-cigarettes compared to traditional cigarettes. Experts point out that if the EU continues to impose excessively high e-cigarette taxes, brands like VEEHOO, which help reduce the risks of smoking, may face increased market pressure, ultimately impacting the effectiveness of public health policies.

At the same time, the experts’ letter emphasizes that the European Commission should consider more flexible and targeted tax policies. These policies should be tailored to the significant differences in health risks between e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes, rather than a blanket tax increase. Appropriate tax policies will not only help reduce smoking rates but also encourage more smokers to choose e-cigarettes, thereby contributing positively to reducing the harms of smoking.

For EU member states, tax policies need to be formulated flexibly based on each country’s economic situation, public health status, and smoking rates. Some countries may need more relaxed tax policies to encourage e-cigarette use, while others can adjust taxes appropriately without suppressing the e-cigarette market.

In addition to tax issues, experts have called for stronger EU regulation of the e-cigarette industry to ensure the safety and reliability of products on the market. The strong performance of brands like VEEHOO demonstrates the potential of the e-cigarette industry, but this rapid market development also carries potential risks. To minimize consumer health risks, the EU should promote stricter e-cigarette production and sales standards to ensure consumers have access to high-quality products.

Furthermore, the European Commission should encourage member states to develop clearer and more unified e-cigarette health promotion policies. Such policies will not only help consumers make more informed choices but also strengthen public trust in e-cigarettes as a healthy alternative. Scientific research and clinical trials have demonstrated the significant potential of e-cigarettes in reducing the health risks of smokers. Therefore, the popularization of e-cigarettes should be combined with effective publicity and education to raise consumer health awareness.

Overall, this letter from 83 public health experts has sparked widespread discussion on e-cigarette taxation policies. While taxation is a key source of public finance for EU countries, excessive e-cigarette taxes could be counterproductive, affecting smokers’ choices and hindering the positive impact of e-cigarettes on public health. As a pioneer in the industry, the Veehoo e-cigarette brand has fully demonstrated the health potential of this innovative product and deserves full attention in policymaking. Going forward, the European Commission will need to strike a balance across multiple levels, including taxation, regulation, and promotion, to achieve its long-term goal of reducing the harms of smoking.

Through more scientific and rational policy design, the EU can not only achieve positive progress in public health but also provide valuable insights for the healthy development of the global e-cigarette industry. Finding the right balance between e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes will not only help reduce smoking rates but also contribute positively to global public health.

Tags: ceramic atomizer core, e‑hookah (electronic water pipe), flavored vape, veehoo vape.