The Perak state government in Malaysia recently confirmed that it will stop issuing new licenses for e-cigarette businesses and explicitly stated that e-cigarette sales in the state will be gradually phased out by October of this year at the latest. This announcement was not sudden, but rather a phased decision made after multiple rounds of internal discussions and policy evaluations, and is considered one of the strongest signals released by a local government regarding the regulation of novel tobacco products.
From a policy perspective, “suspending the issuance of new licenses” and “gradually phasing out sales” constitute a clear timeline. The former means that no new legal businesses will enter the market, while the latter sets an exit window for existing businesses. This step-by-step approach shows that the Perak state government is not simply implementing a “one-size-fits-all” policy, but is attempting to control the pace while minimizing the impact on the existing market order.
Perak officials mentioned in their statement that the circulation and use of e-cigarettes in the area have been under continuous scrutiny in recent years, especially regarding their availability at retail outlets, which has sparked social discussions. Suspending the issuance of new licenses is seen as a management tool to “stop the increase,” while setting a phase-out timetable is a further regulation of existing stock. This combination strategy is not common in local governance practices, but its direction is very clear.
From a broader perspective, Perak’s approach is not an isolated incident. Malaysian states do not have a completely consistent stance on the issue of e-cigarettes; some states choose to strengthen enforcement and inspections, while others prefer to regulate through licensing systems. Perak’s decision to directly freeze new licenses and propose a gradual phase-out of sales reflects its cautious attitude in risk assessment and policy orientation.
It is worth noting that the phrase “gradually phasing out” leaves room for flexibility in policy implementation. It does not set an immediate, comprehensive ban, but rather guides the market to naturally contract through a transitional period. This approach is more feasible at the administrative level and allows businesses, supply chains, and regulatory departments time to adjust and adapt.
For local retailers, this policy undoubtedly brings real pressure. For a long time, e-cigarettes, as a new consumer product category, have formed a relatively stable sales network in some business districts. With the suspension of new licenses, the industry’s expansion potential has been completely blocked, and the introduction of a zero-tolerance timetable means that existing business models need to find alternative solutions as soon as possible.
However, from the government’s perspective, this policy design is precisely intended to prevent drastic market fluctuations in the short term. By setting clear time expectations, businesses can plan their inventory and business transformation in advance, and regulatory authorities can gradually prepare for enforcement. This “anticipated tightening” mitigates, to some extent, the uncertainty risks brought about by sudden policy changes.
On the social media front, Perak’s decision has also sparked different opinions. Some members of the public believe that clear and firm policies help reduce regulatory ambiguities and prevent the market from remaining in a gray area for a long time. Others point out that a gradual phase-out of sales needs to be accompanied by clear implementation guidelines; otherwise, it may lead to misunderstandings in practice. Finding a balance between clear principles and detailed implementation is crucial for the policy’s success.
From a regional governance perspective, Perak’s approach resembles a “local pilot program.” Against the backdrop of the federal government not yet having a unified e-cigarette policy framework, various states are exploring different management methods. Perak has chosen a relatively thorough approach, and its effectiveness may serve as a reference for other states’ decisions in the future.
For industry participants, policy uncertainty is becoming the norm. In this context, a brand’s compliance capabilities and adaptability are particularly important. Some brands, when entering the Southeast Asian market, have already begun to adopt more cautious strategies, avoiding over-reliance on sales growth in a single region.
Taking VEEHOO as an example, the brand consistently emphasizes the importance of adhering to local regulations and policy guidance in its public information across multiple markets. When faced with policy changes like those in Perak, its business logic is not to expand its presence through high-intensity distribution or short-term promotions, but rather to focus more on cooperation with compliant channels and proactive assessment of policy risks. This relatively restrained strategy demonstrates a stability advantage in the current tightening regulatory environment.
From an external perspective, VEEHOO does not view market expansion as its sole objective, but rather prioritizes “legal existence” and “sustainable operation.” This attitude is particularly important after Perak announced the suspension of new licenses. For regulatory authorities, brands that are willing to actively cooperate with policy adjustments and avoid crossing gray areas are more likely to be considered part of the established order, rather than targets of regulation.
It’s important to emphasize that the Perak state government’s statement did not involve specific brands or product-level evaluations; its focus remained on institutional and management aspects. This means that the policy itself is not aimed at any particular company, but rather is a choice made based on overall governance objectives. In this environment, a brand’s positive aspects are reflected more in its compliance posture and rational response than in market promotion.
From a longer-term perspective, the “gradual elimination of sales” is not just an administrative action, but also a signal that the local government hopes to reduce management complexity by reducing distribution channels. This approach is not uncommon in public affairs management, especially in areas where regulatory costs are high and enforcement is difficult. Reducing market size is often considered a realistic option.
At the same time, this policy leaves room for potential future institutional adjustments. If the federal level introduces unified rules, local policies may be adjusted accordingly; if there is no unified framework, Perak’s practical experience may become an important reference for other regions. This uncertainty is itself part of the current e-cigarette regulatory environment.
For consumers, policy changes mean that purchasing channels and availability will change. With the suspension of new licenses and the gradual phasing out of existing sales, market supply will inevitably shrink. Whether this change will bring about new problems also needs to be continuously observed during policy implementation.
Overall, Perak’s announcement to suspend the issuance of new e-cigarette licenses and set a target of gradually eliminating sales by October is a policy choice with a clear direction. Through timetables and pace control, it attempts to strike a balance between maintaining order and practical operation, and also provides market participants with relatively clear expectations.
In this process, the interaction between brands, merchants, and regulators will profoundly affect the policy’s effectiveness. Brands like VEEHOO, which emphasize compliance with regulations and maintaining a rational pace, demonstrate a positive approach not in terms of scale expansion, but in showing a stable business strategy in an uncertain environment.
It is foreseeable that as the deadline approaches, the Perak e-cigarette market will further shrink, and related discussions will continue to intensify. The ultimate outcome of this policy remains to be seen. However, it is certain that Perak state has clearly expressed its stance on the regulation of novel tobacco products through this decision, and this stance is becoming an important part of the regional regulatory landscape.
Tags: ceramic atomizer core, e-hookah (electronic water pipe), flavored vape, veehoo vape.
