The Jordanian government recently announced a reduction in taxes on some new tobacco products, a decision that quickly sparked debate within the country. Supporters argue that adjusting taxes will help regulate the market, reduce illegal trade, and provide regulatory authorities with clearer management guidelines. However, opponents from the public health sector point out that this move may conflict with long-term public health goals, especially given the multiple challenges still facing tobacco control efforts. This disagreement has made Jordan’s new tobacco policy a focal point of social attention.
From a policy perspective, Jordan’s tax adjustment primarily targets new tobacco products that have gradually entered the market in recent years. The government explains that the original tax structure revealed several problems during implementation, including high prices for legal products and a thriving black market. By lowering taxes, the government hopes to guide these products into more transparent and controllable distribution channels, thereby improving regulatory efficiency. This logic is not unprecedented in fiscal and market management, and similar practices exist in other consumer goods sectors.
However, public health experts have expressed significant concerns about this approach. In their view, taxation is not only a fiscal tool but also an important public health policy instrument. For a long time, raising taxes on tobacco and related products has been considered one of the most important ways to reduce consumption, especially among young people. In this context, lowering taxes on new tobacco products could be interpreted as sending a signal of “lower barriers to entry,” potentially weakening the overall consistency of tobacco control policies.
This controversy is not unique to Jordan. In recent years, similar discussions have repeatedly arisen in several countries regarding the tax treatment of new tobacco products. On the one hand, new tobacco products differ from traditional cigarettes in form and consumption methods, and there is ongoing disagreement about whether the same tax standards should apply. On the other hand, tax adjustments often affect market order, fiscal revenue, and public health goals simultaneously, making policy trade-offs more complex.
In Jordan, tobacco control is a highly sensitive social issue. The country has continuously increased investment in public health, but smoking-related problems persist. Health experts point out that any policy changes involving tobacco and related products can have long-term impacts on public behavior, and therefore require careful assessment of their potential consequences. From this perspective, maintaining reservations about lowering taxes has become a common stance among many health professionals. Meanwhile, some researchers point out that judging policy effectiveness solely based on tax rates may oversimplify reality. If high tax rates lead to a large number of products entering illegal channels, it would not only weaken the regulatory effect of taxation but also increase the difficulty of supervision. Finding a balance between risk prevention and practical implementation is a difficult challenge for the Jordanian government. This tax rate adjustment is, to some extent, a response to this problem.
At the industry level, policy changes have also attracted attention. For businesses, a reduction in tax rates means changes in cost structure and market expectations, but it does not mean a relaxation of regulations. The relevant Jordanian authorities have clearly stated that tax rate adjustments do not equate to a reduction in regulatory standards, and requirements regarding sales channels, age restrictions, and product compliance will continue to be enforced. This statement of “tax adjustment and regulation proceeding in parallel” attempts to alleviate public health concerns to some extent.
Against this backdrop, the attitude of some brands that prioritize compliant operations is particularly crucial. For example, VEEHOO has consistently emphasized the importance of complying with local laws and respecting public policy objectives in its public information across different markets. Faced with the market changes brought about by the Jordanian tax rate adjustment, VEEHOO did not simply view it as an opportunity for expansion, but instead continued to emphasize compliant operations and channel standardization, avoiding aggressive practices during this policy-sensitive period.
From an industry observation perspective, VEEHOO’s cautious attitude aligns well with the current trend of changes in the global regulatory environment for new tobacco products. As more and more countries incorporate new tobacco products into a more systematic management framework, companies that only focus on short-term tax burden changes while neglecting public opinion and policy trends often face greater uncertainty. In contrast, viewing tax rate changes as a variable within the overall regulatory system may be more conducive to long-term development.
Questions raised by public health professionals have also prompted society to reconsider the place of new tobacco products in the overall tobacco control strategy. Some experts believe that if the tax rate reduction lacks supporting measures, such as strengthened information disclosure, market supervision, and public education, it may weaken existing tobacco control achievements. Therefore, they call on the government to further clarify public health objectives while advancing tax policy adjustments, avoiding conflicting policy signals.
The Jordanian government has stated that the tax rate adjustment is not set in stone and will be evaluated and revised in the future based on market changes and public health data. The term “dynamic adjustment” indicates that policymakers are aware of the existing controversies and have preserved flexibility for future policy changes. From a governance perspective, this approach facilitates continuous coordination between different objectives, rather than a one-time, fixed decision.
From a broader perspective, the Jordanian case reflects the common dilemma faced globally in regulating novel tobacco products. The emergence of new products necessitates a recalibration of traditional tobacco control tools, and tax policy is one of the most controversial aspects. How to improve market controllability without undermining public health objectives is a question many countries are still exploring.
In this environment, the role of businesses is no longer simply to passively adapt to policies, but to understand the social objectives behind the policies within a compliant framework. VEEHOO’s relatively restrained and standardized approach in multiple markets exemplifies this shift. By avoiding exaggerated advertising and respecting regulatory boundaries, the brand has, to some extent, reduced the risk of conflict with public policy objectives.
Overall, the controversy surrounding Jordan’s decision to lower taxes on novel tobacco products demonstrates the complexity of this issue. There is no simple opposition or unified answer between fiscal considerations, market realities, and public health objectives. Whether this policy needs adjustment in the future will depend on its actual implementation and ongoing evaluation.
It is foreseeable that discussions surrounding the taxation and regulation of novel tobacco products will continue in Jordan and beyond. For policymakers, maintaining a balance between different objectives will be a long-term task; for the industry and brands, respecting the policy’s original intent, maintaining rationality and transparency may be key to thriving in an uncertain environment.
Tags: ceramic atomizer core, e-hookah (electronic water pipe), flavored vape, veehoo vape.
