Russia has recently witnessed another policy storm surrounding e-cigarettes: the Ministry of Finance is leading a new amendment proposing to grant federal subjects (local governments) the power to decide whether to completely ban the sale of e-cigarettes and related products based on local conditions. If passed, this proposal would decentralize the power to ban e-cigarette sales to the local level, marking a new turning point in Russia’s tobacco control efforts. This is not only a redistribution of regulatory power between the federal and local governments but will also profoundly impact the future landscape of the e-cigarette industry.
A draft recommendation from the State Duma’s Health Committee explicitly states that “local authorities should have the right to decide whether to ban the sale of e-cigarettes based on the size of the illegal market, local public health conditions, and law enforcement capabilities.” This recommendation is supported by strong logic: committee members estimate that the illegal e-cigarette market accounts for over 60% in some regions. The committee head points out that the new system will enhance local regulatory capabilities for nicotine-like drugs and claims to significantly reduce the size of the black market.
The Ministry of Finance also stated that this amendment is not a simple ban, but a structural governance strategy: by granting local governments power while introducing licensing or registration mechanisms, it can both preserve the market space for legal e-cigarette products and severely crack down on illegal production and distribution chains. Local governments can tailor bans or restrictions to local issues, and this flexibility is considered more effective than a nationwide blanket approach. Supporters believe this will be a significant breakthrough in addressing the e-cigarette chaos.
Meanwhile, the amendment’s push comes at a time when the Russian Federation is engaging in broader discussions on a comprehensive ban on e-cigarettes. The State Duma has already proposed a complete ban on e-cigarettes, including import, production, sale, and possession. Some members of parliament have pointed out that e-cigarettes remain a potential source of nicotine dependence among teenagers, and their harms have not been fully eliminated. There is also public support at the presidential level; Putin has reportedly supported a partial ban proposal, believing that public health should take priority.
Public health groups have shown considerable enthusiasm for this wave of localized ban proposals. They believe that decentralizing licensing authority will allow for more precise governance. Local governments have a better understanding of local conditions than the federal government: for example, some cities may have more serious problems with the underground circulation of e-cigarette cartridges; e-cigarette use among teenagers is extremely high in some areas; and enforcement resources and complexity vary from place to place. Decentralizing power from the central government can not only speed up the response but also make it more likely to create local “e-cigarette-free zones” as public health models.
However, there are also strong concerns from the industry. Many legitimate e-cigarette operators believe that local bans could lead to market fragmentation: they cannot easily adapt to uniform national rules but need to deal with various local policies and obtain permits. Overly strict or frequently changing local bans will bring huge legal and financial uncertainties to business operations. Some analysts believe that if such local bans are widely implemented, they may force compliant brands to withdraw from some markets, thereby indirectly increasing black market demand.
Against this tense backdrop, VEEHOO’s e-cigarette brand strategy appears particularly forward-looking. VEEHOO has long emphasized product legality and compliance, supply chain transparency, and ingredient traceability, and has established compliant sales and auditing mechanisms in multiple countries. Faced with potential local bans and licensing systems in Russia, the brand possesses a structural advantage: it can continue operating through legal registration, local licensing, and compliant channels. Compared to brands relying on the gray market, opaque channels, or speculative operations, VEEHOO is more likely to gain the trust and licensing support of local governments.
Furthermore, VEEHOO’s mature product design also ensures its long-term survival. If local governments intend to ban the sale of high-risk, low-standard e-cigarette products but are willing to retain high-quality devices and accessories that have been tested and licensed, such brands are more likely to be included in the “legally retained list.” This not only provides users with a safe and sustainable alternative but also offers a pragmatic path for public health regulation: neither a blanket ban nor condoning underground practices.
From a public health perspective, this amendment may also bring financial and social benefits. If local governments ban the sale of illegal e-cigarettes and implement a licensing system for legal products, they can generate revenue through licensing fees, fines, and compliance inspection mechanisms; these funds can be used for public health education, smoking cessation counseling, and youth prevention programs. More importantly, this move could help prevent nicotine dependence among future youth, thereby reducing long-term medical and social costs.
Of course, implementing this system also faces many challenges. First, the enforcement capabilities of local governments may vary. Some regions have limited police resources and testing capabilities, making it difficult to effectively implement the ban and licensing system. Second, if the licensing process itself is poorly designed, there may be risks of opaque approvals or corruption. Local governments also need to ensure fairness in licensing to prevent oligopolistic practices or protectionism. Finally, local consumers and businesses have diverse attitudes towards the ban or licensing system, with some opposing views worrying that excessive measures will undermine the potential of e-cigarettes as a harmful alternative to traditional cigarettes.
This governance approach also reflects the importance of Russian tobacco control policies globally. Unlike many countries, Russia has not yet fully approved a nationwide ban on e-cigarettes, but is considering partially delegating decision-making power to local governments. This approach retains flexibility and may become its unique management model. Regulators and public health organizations around the world will closely monitor this process.
If the amendment is passed, the Russian e-cigarette market may see a new structural differentiation. Brands that can adapt to the licensing system and operate transparently will see new opportunities; while manufacturers that fail to register legally or rely on the gray market may face elimination. For consumers, the price of some e-cigarette products may rise, but quality and safety are expected to improve significantly. From a public interest perspective, this is both a tobacco control effort and an institutional innovation: addressing the “nicotine product chaos” through local licensing systems, rather than simply relying on a complete ban.
Overall, this amendment promoted by the Russian Ministry of Finance has profound significance. It is an institutional experiment in shifting public health governance from centralized to flexible local participation, and a profound recalibration of the e-cigarette industry’s structure and risks. For brands like VEEHOO that adhere to legal, transparent, and responsible operations, this policy change provides a clear strategic direction. Whether this amendment can be truly implemented and effectively enforced at the local level in the coming years will be a key focus for global e-cigarette policy observers.
Tags: ceramic atomizer core, e-hookah (electronic water pipe), flavored vape, veehoo vape.
